Showing posts with label paradism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label paradism. Show all posts

Saturday, August 5, 2017

The Grand Illusion: Good vs Evil

Thanks to our entertainment industry, and sadly, our very history, we as a people believe there is  such a thing as a struggle between good and evil in this world.  This implies that some human beings are inherently empathetic and moral and some that are inherently hurtful and immoral.

Well, it turns out, biologically, about 95% of human beings have a fairly strong social moral imperative towards empathy towards other human beings and living things.  This makes our society automatically and understandably cooperative and helpful to each other.  The chemical responsible for it all is oxytocin (sometimes called the friendship drug).  The 5% of human beings that don't have a strong social moral imperative don't have an oxytocin response built in, so they are antisocial individuals, not necessarily evil or criminal, though, when push comes to shove, they will typically be the first to exhibit such bad behaviors.

But this is true only when the society is abundant.  When hit with scarcity of basic needs and over-stressed, a society will typically revert to selfish behaviors that will engender actions that will augment their chances of survival.

So if you look at it this way:  if our society provides comfort and reduces stress for people, a dominant portion of the population will be cooperative, helpful and loving towards each other, even strangers.  On the other hand, if our society provides an environment of competition for basic needs, our people will be stressed and therefore antisocial behaviors increases.

So no, there is no such thing as Good and Evil people:  only good and bad social structures driving behaviors.

Also, based on research done at the University of British Columbia in psychology, we as a species are also more motivated in reducing stress, and therefore, becoming more stable socially, by relieving ourselves of tasks we do not find enjoyable.  In essence, given an amount of money, we feel happier buying time than buying material goods.  This is a simple biological imperative based on motivations to relieve discomfort or feeling more comfortable.

Therefore, logically, as a society with plenty of time-liberating technologies such as automation, artificial intelligence, robotics and more, we should be striving towards providing basic needs to our people and relieving their stress as much as possible.

I talk more about the Good and Evil paradigm in the video below:



We have to change the way our economies work to encourage personal and social well-being.  Currently, companies are created to grow profits, which oftentimes means social good and a population's health is jeopardized for it.  We now from research that good habits like fasting improve health but the food and pharmaceutical industries, powerhouses in our economy, don't want us to make it a popular thing.  Governments are not very different as impersonal entities striving to grow their influence, often to the detriment of the population they are supposed to represent and of course others.

This must also change.

Collectively, if we do change our way to doing things fundamentally, by making sure every single person on the planet has basic needs met and lives a stress-free life, the greater majority of the population, the empathetic 95%, would be completely devoted to everyone's well-being and health.  The remaining 5% would generally follow the trend because they have no selfish reason to be criminal or dangerous to others.

What a world could that be?

Thankfully, thanks to some people and organizations that work towards paradigm changes, like yourselves I'm sure, and thanks to technological advancements and distribution of free information through the Internet, our world is transforming quickly into an extraordinary place:

  1. The Internet is creating a global village of informed people:  Having the ability to double check on sources, ask questions of online experts and generally get second opinions on just about anything for free makes us largely more educated as a people and thus less prone to react based on fear.
  2. A new de-centralized model is halting unabated consumerism:  people are tired of giant firms controlling lives and promoting their product.  People are much more informed and focus on what is good for THEM, instead of what is good for others.  Lots of smaller companies are emerging and even more individuals are offering services now to others.  Products and services are no longer the purview of the large firms.  Even concepts like eBay, Freelancer, Uber and Airbnb, with their huge successes, show that people are willing to trust other individuals to provide services properly.  We are linking each other as individuals through platforms created by larger firms, but the services themselves are more and more person to person, creating stronger social ties and alleviating the fear of the "other guy".
  3. A better work model is emerging:  people are more and more self-employed, and among those that are still employed with large companies, are often working from home, making their lives less stressful.  Smaller companies employ the larger proportion of the working population nowadays, all with different ways of doing things, giving rise to choice of employment from the perspective of the workers.
  4. We have access to healthy food again:  availability of information ensures that people are better educated about what they should be eating and from what sources.  This makes them better advised shoppers for goods.  It's a good thing because commercial interests have been trying to sell their products for years espousing twisted truths about the health benefits of their products over others.  Sometimes, it was about other benefits, like cost.  Even large giants like MacDonalds have had to change their way of doing things and actually attempt to keep their low fast food prices while improving the quality of their food.  GMO companies can no longer carelessly sell products that are unenvironmental, and are redirecting their research towards creating foods that will be healthier instead.  
  5. Mainstream media is not our only source of information anymore:  mainstream media is reputed to be controlled by large financial interests that have their own agenda.  Though not inherently evil, this can skew how information is digested, transferred and ignored.  Lots of small valid media streams exist now allowing individuals access to multiple sources of good information and second opinions.
(I took most of this information from this article, modified according to my own information and research).

In order to continue our journey towards a better world, we should continue, as individuals, to push out information onto the Internet, share, endeavor to adopt educated healthy buying habits to drive the economy towards products and services that we really want for ourselves, our family and others and we have to be engaged in the necessary structural changes that will provide vital basic needs to everyone on the planet, thus ushering in an era of prosperity defined by happiness, empathy and the joy to be alive with extremely minimal criminal incidence.

Isn't that something to work for?  I'm all for it!

Monday, May 8, 2017

A World Without Poverty? Universal Basic Income

It's been an idea that has been circulating since the 1970's as a replacement for social support systems such as Employment Insurance & Welfare as well as a way to increase adult individual's motivations to contribute constructively to societal structures.

Universal Basic Income.

In a nutshell, the concept is if a basal amount of currency is distributed to all families and individuals, enough for them to live plus a little extra, then people are less likely to fall into criminal activity, have significant health issues or to quit school earlier than they should.

To many, it kinda sounds like a form of communism and in some respects, it is and we have heard about how communism has destroyed innovation and business growth in communist countries over history.

So why is Universal Basic Income a good thing now?

Well, right now, as I mentioned in previous blogs, we are approaching a time when computer systems and artificial intelligence can do most of our jobs better than we can, and be creative enough to continue scientific progress and improve technologies (and themselves) better than us.  We're not quite there yet, but Ray Kurzweil's Singularity event is expected to arrive in about 10 years or so, and our world is already abuzz about self-driving cars, personable and intelligent chatbots and smart anticipatory virtual assistants now in 2017.

We'll definitively hit a wall as far as an economy without most adults actually working for a living...

I talk about some of the impacts of all this in the video below:



Governments are quite aware of the dilemma and some more progressive governments have started trials of Basic Income already.

In Finland, 2,000 unemployed Fins will receive in 2017 a monthly amount of $580 USD, replacing their social security payments.  Contrary to social security though, there is minimal administration around the amount since there are no conditions attached.  This means if the unemployed individuals do find work, of any kind, they continue to receive the amount.  This is a two year pilot.

In Ontario, Canada, the  people of the cities of Hamilton, Lindsay and Thunder Bay are participating in a three year pilot project where each individual would receive approximately $1,000 USD per month for living, replacing social programs if any of them were receiving any.  This pilot is limited to individuals aged between 25 and 64, the age at which people receive "old age security" income however.  But on a total population of close to 1,000,000 between the three cities, that's quite a lot of money dispensed in exchange for much less saved (payments in social security systems etc..).

Following suit, Quebec, Canada wishes to introduce a similar program starting in the next few years but in this case, if it is approved, it would not be a pilot project, but go directly live in the Canadian province.

Other countries in Europe are also considering this.

Why now though?  Governments and politicians are not that farsighted are they?  Well, not really.  The increase in automation and the investments in A.I. just tipped things over really.  It has been well known for years that social systems were really not working out for people and thanks to past pilots on basic income, they already knew that long term, it is a financial win, even though in the short term it is very, very expensive to get started.

Based on specialists, the installation of Universal Basic Income into modern society will not only save loads of money and stress in our economy but also encourage creativity and business innovation too.  Just a small reduction in state costs in health and education plus the advantage of having healthier, better educated, happier people with proper resources to reach for the stars is enough, long term to offset the cost of such a program.

In a very real way, we're looking at a potential way to end poverty quite entirely this is great!

The articles below discuss the details of how it all works in the economy and socially way better than I.  Hope you enjoy the read as much as I did.  Suffice to say, Basic Income is not there yet, but with so many countries around the world doing serious budgeted pilots, and technology moving forwards at breakneck speeds, there is no doubt in my mind that we'll all stop worrying about basic monthly bills very soon.

Must read articles:

Enjoy the reads.