Showing posts with label singularity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label singularity. Show all posts

Monday, May 8, 2017

A World Without Poverty? Universal Basic Income

It's been an idea that has been circulating since the 1970's as a replacement for social support systems such as Employment Insurance & Welfare as well as a way to increase adult individual's motivations to contribute constructively to societal structures.

Universal Basic Income.

In a nutshell, the concept is if a basal amount of currency is distributed to all families and individuals, enough for them to live plus a little extra, then people are less likely to fall into criminal activity, have significant health issues or to quit school earlier than they should.

To many, it kinda sounds like a form of communism and in some respects, it is and we have heard about how communism has destroyed innovation and business growth in communist countries over history.

So why is Universal Basic Income a good thing now?

Well, right now, as I mentioned in previous blogs, we are approaching a time when computer systems and artificial intelligence can do most of our jobs better than we can, and be creative enough to continue scientific progress and improve technologies (and themselves) better than us.  We're not quite there yet, but Ray Kurzweil's Singularity event is expected to arrive in about 10 years or so, and our world is already abuzz about self-driving cars, personable and intelligent chatbots and smart anticipatory virtual assistants now in 2017.

We'll definitively hit a wall as far as an economy without most adults actually working for a living...

I talk about some of the impacts of all this in the video below:



Governments are quite aware of the dilemma and some more progressive governments have started trials of Basic Income already.

In Finland, 2,000 unemployed Fins will receive in 2017 a monthly amount of $580 USD, replacing their social security payments.  Contrary to social security though, there is minimal administration around the amount since there are no conditions attached.  This means if the unemployed individuals do find work, of any kind, they continue to receive the amount.  This is a two year pilot.

In Ontario, Canada, the  people of the cities of Hamilton, Lindsay and Thunder Bay are participating in a three year pilot project where each individual would receive approximately $1,000 USD per month for living, replacing social programs if any of them were receiving any.  This pilot is limited to individuals aged between 25 and 64, the age at which people receive "old age security" income however.  But on a total population of close to 1,000,000 between the three cities, that's quite a lot of money dispensed in exchange for much less saved (payments in social security systems etc..).

Following suit, Quebec, Canada wishes to introduce a similar program starting in the next few years but in this case, if it is approved, it would not be a pilot project, but go directly live in the Canadian province.

Other countries in Europe are also considering this.

Why now though?  Governments and politicians are not that farsighted are they?  Well, not really.  The increase in automation and the investments in A.I. just tipped things over really.  It has been well known for years that social systems were really not working out for people and thanks to past pilots on basic income, they already knew that long term, it is a financial win, even though in the short term it is very, very expensive to get started.

Based on specialists, the installation of Universal Basic Income into modern society will not only save loads of money and stress in our economy but also encourage creativity and business innovation too.  Just a small reduction in state costs in health and education plus the advantage of having healthier, better educated, happier people with proper resources to reach for the stars is enough, long term to offset the cost of such a program.

In a very real way, we're looking at a potential way to end poverty quite entirely this is great!

The articles below discuss the details of how it all works in the economy and socially way better than I.  Hope you enjoy the read as much as I did.  Suffice to say, Basic Income is not there yet, but with so many countries around the world doing serious budgeted pilots, and technology moving forwards at breakneck speeds, there is no doubt in my mind that we'll all stop worrying about basic monthly bills very soon.

Must read articles:

Enjoy the reads.

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Hitting the Brick Wall near Singularity

While discussing on the subject of Singularity according to Jay Kurzweil within the Xavier Group Ltd on LinkedIn, I was asked to comment on a phenomenon they called the "Brick Wall" where, as I understood it, humans will try their best NOT to hit the Singularity point where AI becomes more intelligent than humans.  Mostly because of religious groups, people in power, and the fear that these AIs will eventually treat us as an inferios subspecies.

Truly, I think this is very far from what may happen.  Here is my response.

Taking from the research of Paul Chappell who did a great job in his speaking engagements to pull out all sorts of evidence that fundamentally, humans are peaceful beings that only wish to have the basic requirements of living, and beyond that, be free, love and be loved, and live in harmony with everyone else.  He shows in his lectures that violence is in fact something that is conditioned by the people in "power", who themselves are at arm's length of the violence perpetrated, and direct good people down the violent road for their own selfish ambition.

This is actually very important when we consider AI.

It means that for the most part, us humans will create AI that are.. well, like us.  computers that aren't violent at all.  Right now, there are still people in "power" that try to control us.  In the most communications-dense countries like Europe, Japan and North-America, its getting harder and harder for the "powers" to control people.  The real information is literally at our fingertips and instant, and penetration of the truth through social networks just reveals the bullshit of the "powers".  So in these countries, where most of the highest tech is developed anyway, we're not really moving towards a system where we're going to build super AI's in the pre-Singularity timeline that will be agressive and out to destroy....  At least that is my hope.

The acceleration of technology and propagation of information into other less-developed countries will bring them to par with us and the population as well informed as us in just a few years.  Peter Diamandis of the Singularity University estimates 66% of people on the planet will be Internet connected in the year 2020.  It is estimated that almost all people will be connected by 2029.
So it seems to be going in a direction where super AIs on the point of singularity will be programmed to support humanity as they surpass our intellectual capabilities.

Psychologists today say that humans are wired to feel pleasure, to love and to be loved.  That's basic to our innards beyond food, sleep and security for us, once more a programmed survival instinct.  Therefore intelligent humans that have all those things feel content.

Therefore it can be assumed that AIs that are wired or programmed for work, dangerous missions, or, get this, deriving satisfaction from say creating tasty vegetables at a highest yield, will use their intelligence to achieve just that.

If we treat AIs just like people, their basic needs and programming cannot be changed so if we program them to get satisfaction from something we feel is boring, repetitive or mundane, that's what they will enjoy doing, just like we'll enjoy whatever we wish to do.

IMHO then and in conclusion, we are directing ourselves towards a coexistence with AIs.  There is also nothing preventing humans from improving on ourselves either mind you.  Heck, the scientific programmed AIs can probably help us out of pleasure too!
Cheers!

Monday, October 8, 2012

The Technological Singularity and the Future

According to Ray Kurzweil and Peter Diamandis of the Singularity University, the technological Singularity is:

The point where Artificial Intelligence surpasses human intelligence. They estimate it happening in 2029.

Here is the original definition by science fiction author, Vernor Vinge, who described it as a point in time where “…we will have the technological means to create superhuman intelligence. Shortly after, the human era will be ended.”

He continues:

“I think it's fair to call this event a singularity. It is a point where our models must be discarded and a new reality rules. As we move closer and closer to this point, it will loom vaster and vaster over human affairs till the notion becomes a commonplace. Yet when it finally happens it may still be a great surprise and a greater unknown."

So very enigmatic… and a little scary. In reality, even today we don’t really know what will happen near or beyond the point of technological singularity.

I discuss the subject matter in this video: 



Let’s examine some laws and human history for a bit.

Moore’s Law of computing says the number of transistors on integrated circuits, which translates into memory, speed, capacity, computer intelligence etc… doubles approximately every two years. This has been going on since the first computers appearing in the 1950’s.

Why is Moore’s Law’s computing power doubling every 2 years so consistent after over 60 years of computer improvements? Well, because we’ve been using computers to build the next generation computers.

If you are fond of math let’s look at how Moore’s Law applies:

The first UNIVAC computer in 1951 would be able to make about 2000 simple additions or subtractions per second. Of course, that’s way faster than any human can calculate. So UNIVAC was great for accelerating calculations and would not need any sleep. Therefore computers became a complement to our lives, allowing us to focus on the more creative aspects of work while the computers assisted in processing speed.

According to Moore’s Law though, every 2 years after 1951, the computing speed doubled. Therefore, for each 2 years after 1951, the amount of calculations per second would double. This means in 1971, 20 years later (10 2 year cycles, increasing the amount of calculations each cycle), the 2000 calculations per second in 1951 would have been increased by 2 to the power 10 (2000 x 2^10 milliseconds = nearly 2 million calculations per second). Let’s now warp to today, which starting off in 1971 is 21 2 year cycles further down the line, where the speed of computing has probably increased by another 2^21 times. This means about 4 x 10^12 calculations per second.

Well guess what, the fastest computer (the K computer) on Earth today is Japanese and is 2500 times faster than that at 10 x 10^15 calculations per second. That is a 10 with 15 zeros. However, our desktop computers are pretty close to the Moore’s Law’s predicted speed.

Ok, let’s now look at the future near the point of Singularity… The fastest computer will be 2^8 times faster than one in 2013 (singularity being predicted for 2029). That’s 256 times the K computer’s speed. I won’t even write down the number but there are 18 zeros now.

Feel outmatched by our little mobile devices?

Well you shouldn’t because our brain, though structured differently, can execute 2 x 10^16 calculations per second. You’re just not aware of all the power sitting inside your skull and it is attached to the rest of our body, which let’s face it, does a lot more for us than just compute. 2 x 10^16 calculations per second is currently more than what the K computer can achieve by a factor of 10.

So in 2029, computers will presumably be able to compute 100 times faster than our own brain, hence the theory we can make them intelligent machines, and not only in speed but in creativity too.

Now let’s look back just a little at what humanity has accomplished with the Internet:

- The Internet was really born in the 1960’s as a government funded project along with some private firms to create a stable distributed network of early computers. At that time it was a closed circuit and really just experimental.

- In the 1980’s, more government funds and private commercial efforts brought it to the public for the first time merging a few emergent networks together. This network was stabilized into a single system in 1995, creating the ISP system we know of today.

- In the mid 1990’s, the eCommerce boom and web site revolution generated massive amounts of available information discoverable on the Web.

- Google incorporated in 1998 with a single product, the Google Search engine, and dominated over the others because it was just a superior use of the available technology at the time.

- In 1999 Napster became famous for peer to peer network systems and caused lots of issues in the traditional music industry.

- Internet crash of 2000-2001 where Internet businesses were over evaluated and many perished, giving birth to some solid internet business models.

- 2001 to 2012. Growth and maturation of the Internet as a separate “world”. i.e. Facebook, Pinterest, LinkedIn, Twitter are now places people “live”. Also, people can live complete virtual lives on the Internet through social and game software like Second Life, Entropia Universe and other 3D games where you can have a home, clothing, children and do all sorts of “real life” activities.

- In 2010 was even the first low orbit Internet connection made when astronaut T.J. Carter posted his first unassisted Twitter update from the International Space Station, expanding the Internet to orbital space.

The point is, it took us over 40 years to structure the Internet to a form of maturity when the bubble burst near the year 2000. Then it took only 12 years to go from online tool to immersive experience and carrying the Web in our pockets.

Mobile phone technology followed a similar trend from the 1950’s to today, where now our pocket devices are almost as powerful as our desktop computers and are fully internet capable.

Today through Skype, a free voice over IP app, we can place a free call to Japan on my mobile device and speak as long as I want for free. This alone was unthinkable 10 years ago when everybody wanted to become rich through the Internet explosion.

Today, I can share a video of an incident happening in the middle of nowhere and stream it directly to Youtube and have people and media alike around the world capture that as news within seconds. Youtube by the way was born only 7 years ago.

Today, 1 person out of 4 is connected to the Internet. That’s close to 2 billion people. It is estimated that by the year 2020, 66% of the world, more than 3 billion people at that time will have regular internet access and almost all of them will be accessing it from mobile devices to boot!

This means that 2/3 of the world will be able to get information, tools, software and much more from most other brains in the world. There will be no more secrets and there sure will be way more understanding between us, and a lot more people will be collaborating together on projects across borders.

Now let’s also look at the Open source movement. Prior to the year 2000, if you wanted to create software, you needed a company to do so and you needed to buy the software just like any other product. Now, most people with a little technical knowledge can create software on their own or very easily on their desktops. Right now, making a new piece of software requires a single person, a normal computer and in most cases free tools from the web and boom a few hours later, there is a new game, or application floating on iTunes , the Android store, or the web ready to be freely downloaded. Software creation has been roughly following Moore’s Law and has been following the same pattern of evolution as that of the computer and handheld devices.

This acceleration and building tech on top of technology is very exciting and brings us closer and closer to the moment of singularity we spoke about earlier.

Scientists have been working on nanorobots for years. These are robots that are small enough to enter the bloodstream, enter cells and even manipulate matter at an atomic level. This is very cool stuff where biological molecules are used as motors to move them around and DNA as power and memory device. Yet thanks to computer and software progressing fast they could eventually have a wireless connection, memory, reprogramming capability and the ability to think on their own intelligently. Because these little buggers will be able to manipulate matter at an atomic level, it means they can be programmed to replicate to handle bigger jobs.

Don’t worry, these are not expected to be in application until… well, around 2030 or so, where they will be smarter than the average human anyway, so they will probably not normally mess things up…

Imagine having a few of these things at hand. And say you want a new shirt made out of a certain non-allergenic material you like. Now what you will do is go on the Internet and look for the shirt program you want, likely programmed by some guys in their basement in Indonesia as an Open source project or for fun. Give it a bunch of junk materials, like recycling and garbage, some air and dirt if you have it, and it will reproduce enough nanobots to build the shirt in the color you wanted in a few minutes using the chemical structure you wanted (pollution free, allergen free and what have you) by consuming the garbage you gave it. Heck, if the shirt doesn’t fit perfectly, you can always order the nanobots to disassemble it to harmless chemicals, or even lunch. When their job is done you can order them into a little container for later use.

Using your imagination, we can think of other applications like food built from waste, surgery executed without knives or needles and power generation with absolutely no environmental consequence.

What does that mean for our society?

- If information is readily available to anyone at any time from any source, official or not.

- If Artificial Intelligence surpasses human Intelligence

- You can make anything out of anything using super intelligent nanobots

- People have the means to create software on their own easily through open source, free software creation tools and advances in computer power.

Why would we be working for a living?

Why would there be any need for people in positions of power?

Why would we have national armies or even war?

Why would there be a need for money in the first place?


We would be living in a state of harmony where technology would do all the hard labor, figure out solutions before there are problems and would essentially run all of our systems. Heck computers will likely achieve some scientific breakthroughs and create great works of art.

Not only that but the AI will be able to improve upon itself further, without our involvement. Heck, computers will improve faster without our involvement at that point.

People would be free to live peacefully with each other doing whatever pleases them, whether it is art, science, sports, whatever. Poverty, war, famine and harsh conditions are therefore a thing of the past.

Now some of you think that this is a dangerous time, especially if AI think for us. Imagery from movies like Terminator, iRobot and many others come to mind where the most powerful AI takes over and tries to enslave or annihilate humanity for its own good.

But I don’t think we can count on science fiction authors to predict everything correctly. After all, 1984 didn’t really happen the way George Orwell depicted after all.

I can’t predict what will happen. But look at the news and the apparent revolutions brewing in the world, for the most part peaceful. Things are changing. Fast, and for the most part the little guy is taking good decisions usurping the great powers that have until today been able to direct the populations along the wrong path.

It’s quite encouraging to see beyond the troubles we see today into a potentially very rewarding future.

Think about it. Think about your involvement in the new world. I hope, like me, you will working on enabling a bright future for us all.