You read the title. This is yet another nicely written and researched scientific paper that gives a TOTALLY different perspective of our understanding of the universe. i.e. according to these calculations, the Universe would have no beginning, no end and would be of a constant "size".
As always, I like to check the sources of these things to see if it has validity and looking at this one, its published in Physics Letters B, in the theories section, not in the cosmological or physics section. I am unsure if Physics Letters B theories get peer reviewed at this point so I issue a caution that this is just an interesting discussion of possibilities that can lead to really interesting stuff than something that is super solid (for the time being).
In essence the physicists Ahmed Farag Ali (Center for Fundamental Physics, Giza, Egypt) and Saurya Das (University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada), both active university professors in their respective institutions, have collaborated to look at the math that describes the formation and movements of the universe in a very different way.
Left: Ahmed Farag Ali. Right: Saurya Das
This link gives a good analysis summary of the paper itself. Well written I must say.
My video below goes into a bit of details and some extra thoughts I have on the subject. Check it out. This subject is filled with psychological charge as changing from Big Bang to an infinite Universe does have significant impact on how we think of ourselves and our place as conscious beings within... :) Check it out!
In summary, what Prof Ali and Prof Das did was to substitute a core mathematical process called geodesics with (Bohmian) quantal trajectories and patched the math to what we can observe of the universe and saw if the mathematical result along with Einstein's general relativity would be better able to predict other parts of the universe we currently are able to observe.
From what I can see, this theory, as far as predictability of reality, works just as well as the Big Bang Theory.
Big Bang model diagram
The reason the Big Bang Theory became more popular was that particles in the current universe tend to always follow geodesic patterns, so I believe it was just more natural to approach the question of "how did the Universe come to be?" using those same models.
The problem encountered is that the results of geodesics is that you always end up with singularities, points where mass always converges together. So its only natural that following this logic with the math, the very beginning of the Universe would naturally be a single singularity, a single point of matter where everything exists at once.
The problem of the Big Bang Theory and using geodesics to predict this, is that it cannot calculate what happens at the moment of the universe creation and, well, what was there prior.
Of course the Big Bang Theory was well in line with deist concepts of God creating things from a single snap of his fingers many years ago, but in a realistic sense, most scientists (and most people) have always been uncomfortable, rationally, with such a large amount of mass being in a single point and then exploding outwards to create ... everything....
Not to mention that using this math, we end up with all sorts of forces that must be accounted for with theoretical concepts like Dark Matter and Dark Energy, concepts put in as placeholders to fill in the gaps we can't figure out. And Big Bang Theorists are therefore always chasing after these Dark elements to give credence to the theory.
Infinite Universe (how can we illustrate something that has no age and size?
In the case of the "Cosmology from Quantum Potential" paper by Das and Ali, with quantal trajectories, singularities are, in contrast, actually mathematically impossible by definition of the mathematical assumptions. So we're trading the guarantee of a singularity with the impossibility of singularities.
What occurs in the math is that we also don't end up with Dark Matter and Dark Energies, which is good since those buggers are really annoying. Instead, for things to work, the universe has to be filled with quantum fluid made up of really tiny particles. All macro matter, like atoms and bigger, are floating in this soup. And based on their math, things all come together nicely. And in this case, the universe has always been and always will be (no age).
Which is better? Time will tell. The issue is that we're dealing with lots of assumptions we can't test really in both cases. The interesting thing to me is that now there are two seemingly valid theories up in play that both carry annoying assumptions but give very different results.
Food for thought really.
This blog by Dr. Hugh Ross about this paper really does a good job at giving pros and cons of the new theories.
Its obvious that Dr. Hugh Ross is a God-fearing man, given his bio but its a good blog from another perspective so I like it.
As for myself, I'm an atheist and a Raëlian so I'm partial philosophically to the Infinite Universe theory.
Science will continue poking at things and at some point in time we'll find a good model that will figure everything out.
My blog about Nassim Haramein is a good tangent to take on the explanation of the fabric of the universe (and the peer-reviewed paper that was published by the man not long ago. :)
I would like to take the time today to showcase some real science for a change. By real science I mean science from a highly credible individual from academia that published some papers that were peer-reviewed and accepted in the scientific community.
In a nutshell, the results of the papers produced can be used as springboards for brand new thinking, new valid science and of course, applications that can affect our lives.
Today, I'll be writing about Nassim Haramein who wrote a revolutionary paper called "Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass". Just to give you some context of legitimacy, Dr. Haramein is the Director of Research at the Hawaii Institute for Unified Physics, a very public organization that focuses on solving the unified field theories. The institute is not well known or large but it has produced several peer-reviewed papers over the years.
This has come to me, with thanks, from a bright mind that has subscribed to my Youtube channel, whose name I cannot find anymore. This is the beauty of the connection we have with others through the Internet isn't it?
Before I describe what Dr. Haramein's paper means to us today, here is my youtube video that describes things verbally for those of you who prefer vids:
So this is going to be a summary because the impact of what M. Haramein's research is ASTOUNDING.
We need to travel back to 1820 before we get to M. Haramein though to put context to things. Starting in 1820 with physicist James Clerk Maxwell, scientists started to try to unify scientific concepts that were until then quite separate. In Maxwell's case, he figured out how electromagnetic fields play with the speed of light in his "Dynamic Theory of the Electromagnetic Field" paper. This was ground breaking because until then every little bit of science describing the natural world was separate sciences and disconnected.
Over time, including Albert Einstein's work in 1915 where he created the first true version of the "Unified Field Theory", an attempt to unify more elements like gravitational forces to Maxwell's and others in other to put all the little bits of science that would explain how the world works together. He did a great job but he still had some pieces missing. It is even said that he kept trying until the day of his death.
If we could only understand how everything kind of plays together, then we could possibly create applications that would be quite awesome.
Well, possibly with M. Haradeim's research, we can start doing just that. What he did in a nutshell is simply add a critical part to the giants that came before him, adding torque to the Unified Field Theory, and it seems to all work out.
As a result of the math, it seems like the infinitively small (protons, subatomic particles etc...), who have spin/torque, behave in exactly the same way as the infinitively large (galaxies, solar systems, planets etc....). This new element to the equations, the torque part, explains how information in the universe propagates and "talks" to each other in very different ways, not through any magical or indescribable means.
Wow.
As a consequence, this understanding can allow us to, for example, draw energy from the void within atoms, which is not really void/empty at all since it contains forces that could potentially be tapped.
Engineers get ready ! We need you to figure out how to tap into those spin and torque forces that are present in EVERYTHING to power all sorts of processes without harming anything on a macro level, like the environment, people, animals etc....
Here is an interesting deep interview by Cutting Edge Consciousness with Dr. Nassim Haramein:
Now, let's be clear for those of you who have been following me to evaluate M. Mehran Keshe's research and Foundation: Dr. Haramein is the real deal... not a person or science that I shed doubt on at all. There is NO application that has emerged so far based directly on Dr. Haramein's research, which was published in 2013. BUT, we can start working with the new knowledge to create something real, safe and useful for humanity today.
And that's where my mind is at. In essence, this new understanding could allow us to manipulate gravity, matter, energy, magnetism in ways we could not conceive before. Science building upon science at work !
If you wish to receive summaries of the top research papers on the planet, I recommend you subscribe, like I do, to the Google mailing list rael-science. Scientists I know look constantly for the most advanced research papers going on the planet and the paper abstracts with links are sent to the mailing list. That way, you get good valid scientific papers, up to date, right in your e-mail box.
All you have to do to join the mailing list is to send a blank e-mail to subscribe@rael-science.org and you're ready to go.
Recently, I've been researching and discussing alternate energy devices with lots of people, either through this blog, or through my youtube channel.... mostly because of the Keshe Foundation analysis I did a couple weeks ago.
There is a growing interest in both weaning ourselves off the powerful energy cartels and "the Grid" but also to enter into a new era of peace, harmony and ... technology. All things that are interesting to me, of course.
Since we haven't received the Keshe Plasma Reactors yet for testing, I decided that I would go over more conventional and better known alternate energy sources... focusing on the kind you could build yourselves to provide plentiful energy for your family.
All of the techs I'll present below can be done on the average budget and some for less than $100, which is great!
Thank you Open Source movement, and thank you Internet (== humans sharing freely and openly their expertise on the Internet!).
In this article, we'll be going through these alternate technologies. I'm going a little deeper in the following youtube video too:
Wind turbine power
Water turbine power
Kymogen Wave Energy Generator
Solar panel power
The Keshe Plasma Reactor
Wind turbine power
Wind turbines are simply propellers directed into the wind. The wind catches the blades, make them spin, gets the generator moving, which creates your electricity. Other things than a generator can be used (like a car's alternator) as the important part is to have a rotor with a stator that rotate one against the other. Rotors and stators have coils of copper that generate magnetic fields and when the rotor turns near the stator, the magnetic fields "rub against each other", creating electricity in the copper wires. Electricity generation 101. :)
What you need to build a wind turbine to power your home:
A generator
Blades
A mounting that keeps it turned into the wind
A tower to get it up into the wind
Batteries and an electronic control system
Basically you need to get all these parts to get started, most of which you can get from a scrap yard, equipment you already have around the house and don't use, and the missing pieces you can get from hardware stores and whatnot. If you are frugal, you can make all this happen for less than $100. If you prefer buying systems, but for about $4,000 USD per Kilowatt. Not so cheap.
Advantages:
Easy to operate and maintain
Inexpensive to build
Low expertise needed to build
Can be scaled up to accommodate larger homes/neighbors by increasing blade diameter and other parameters
Large amount of resources out there that can help
Disadvantages:
Is known to kill birds at times that don't see the blades spinning and fly in
Can be inefficient in areas where there is inconsistent wind flow
The water turbine principle is the same as for the wind turbine, except that instead of channelling the wind through blades that look like aircraft blades, you will want to channel water onto the blades that look more like spoons in order to capture the maximum amount of kinetic energy from the water. What's great about water turbines is that its way easier to have a consistent turbine speed as the speed of the water is easier to control than... well, untameable wind. Like the wind turbines, the spoon blades are spinning a generator (rotor and stator) to create your electricity flow in your cable.
What you need to build a water turbine to power your home:
A generator
"spoon-like" blades
A mounting that keeps your blades in high speed current
A setup that keeps the equipment it safely in the water stream without shortcut or corrosion issues
Batteries and an electronic control system
A water stream or river nearby (or make one, see below)
Again, like the wind turbines, most of the equipment needed to build one can be done with $100 or less, which is terrific but you have to think about how to set up the turbine safely within a water source like a river or stream, or better yet, build a way to channel a portion of racing water on to the turbine spoons to make them spin at a good consistent pace. You can even create a water stream if you live on or near a mountain slope where you can channel rainwater down to your turbine setup, possibly also using the mountain to build a little aqueduct of fresh water at the same time for drinking water or water of general use.
Advantages:
Easy to operate and maintain
Inexpensive to build
Low expertise needed to build
Can be scaled up to accommodate larger homes/neighbors by increasing blade diameter and other parameters
Large amount of resources out there that can help
Consistent day to day electricity flow
Disadvantages:
Won't work so well in freezing climates in winter as the water flow will diminish at least or totally freeze over. Water levels will change too.
Requires a racing water source, either natural or artificial for this to work
This device is ridiculously simple but not well know. You may have heard of Tidal Wave Energy generation which takes the movement of the tides to generate mechanical movement between magnetic fields (i.e. in a similar way turbines turn to generate electricity), but tidal devices need to be Huge, which is impractical to building them near your home. The Kymogen device is the tidal wave generator's little brother, one that can be set up to harness the kinetic energy of simple waves on a nearby lake. The larger the waves the better.
Below is a link where you can check it out in detail. The company tried to raise funds for a Kickstarter campaign, but it failed. However, based on my research, it wouldn't be terrible to build such a device yourself. The floating apparatus part that "rides the waves" is about 800 lbs total to properly sit on the waves and properly go up and down to generate juice but if you want to have a nice floating device at your cottage to play around with and swim around, why not combine it with energy generation? There is no dangerous parts inside so why not?
Advantages:
Easy to operate and maintain
Relatively cheap to build, relative to the need for it to be large in size and weight.
Low expertise needed to build
Can be combined to be used as a floating deck or diving board for the lake at the cottage
Consistent day to day electricity flow
Disadvantages:
Pretty large setup to generate electricity
More energy is generated via larger waves, so size of equipment can't help. More of them tethered would be needed to double or triple capacity, which may be undesirable visually and environmentally
Not a lot of information out there on how to build these right now
Everyone is hot for solar panels, which is great because the sun is the ultimate renewable energy source right? Well, its one of them and indeed pretty much there all day. The issue is day lengths change depending on latitude on the globe, time of year and whether or not there are annoying clouds in the sky blocking the sun.
Personally, I love solar energy. The issue I have is in the production of most of the commercially available solar panels, lots of pollution is created. There are some now that are way more environmentally friendly in their production so please be careful when you shop.
Solar panels can be made at home, but its hard enough already to have decent efficiency of energy conversion, I would strongly recommend using commercial ones. The link below has plenty of resources leading to building them or buying them, pros and cons etc.... for further research.
What is exciting about solar energy is that in many states, provinces and countries, there are government funded programs where you can actually get your solar farm financed and the extra energy sold back to the grid. In Ontario, Canada, if you are accepted as part of the Feed Tariff Program you can get your solar energy done and maintained on your room and make perhaps a few thousand $ a year in cash for your trouble. In Ontario, the reason why they do this is to get off the coal-burning plants we have to generate electricity. Pretty cool deal to look into.
If you're not into such a thing, you can probably make due with the purchase of about 4-6 standard sized solar panels on your roof to generate enough electricity for your home. If you are building an Earthship, you may need less as Earthships are great modern, environmentally friendly home concepts that are designed to be off the grid, thus energy requirements are minimalized even in cold weather.
Combined with a battery system and the proper electricity flow controller, electricity flow is consistent
Can take advantage of regional government Green programs to finance the setup and maintenance of a whole solar farm.
Can easily feed back and make some decent money reselling extra electricity to the grid
Solar energy resources are abundant on the internet
Disadvantages:
Solar panels are expensive if you want your own setup
Many solar panels are not environmentally friendly to manufacture. Must take care on purchase.
Not great for every latitude. Best for areas with long days of sun with low cloud coverage yearly, for best results.
For instructions on how to build, buy or setup, here is a link.
Keshe Plasma Reactor
This is something I've been investigating quite a bit for the last 2 weeks as its technology that defies our current scientific understanding, essentially creating a new branch of science alongside quantum physics to really understand.
I am in the process of validating this technology with other scientists and engineers by testing 2 of the devices and making sure its all on the "up and up". Just because we can't really explain the science behind it all... if it does the job, we'll figure out the scientific principles fully afterwards, together and with the community.
For the time being, I've added this to the list for 3 reasons:
The reactors are made of environmentally friendly components
Any person could build one to power their home for less than $100 using commonly available materials
This tech, if validated, could revolutionize the world and help bring world peace by completely demolishing the whole oil and energy industries towards something democratic (build it yourself) and controlled by the people.
At this point in time, I haven't received the ordered reactors, have not done validation tests but I have studied hours upon hours of videos and written materials.
I consider this energy device as Theoretically ok. For now and until quantitative and qualitative tests are done after device reception. Standby for those results in future blogs. I DO NOT encourage people to bet their livelihoods and change their lives at this point to convert to this technology.
I would encourage people who are interested in this technology to assess it for themselves by watching and listening to videos posted in Kevin Flynn's youtube channel . M. Flynn is one of M. Keshe's helpers for Youtube so you get official workshop videos on the science and how to build these reactors from this channel, and directly from M. Keshe, the nuclear physicist that has defined the science, dubbed Plasma science by him.
In a nutshell, the principle is all about converting physical copper wires into a cold superconductor, hence delivering a constant and infinite flow of electricity within the copper wire. Superconductors, for those who don't know, have the property of having no electrical resistance, so in practicality, electricity generated by the device through plasma principles (see below) can flow any distance and at optimum strength within wires.
The copper wires become superconductors via a precise arrangement of matter around the copper wire from physical copper (the wire) to the deposition of nanoparticles (like CuO2) to what M. Keshe calls GANS (Gas state nanostructrures), something that looks like a paste. This arrangement creates a gradient in the gravitational and magnetical (not magnetic... magnetical is a new word defined by M. Keshe for a force that opposes the gravitational) that drives the waveforms of the subatomic to channel these energies toward the wire.
Then the way the wires themselves are coiled and connected, creates gravitational and magnetical fields at a macro scale that pushes out electricity, after it has been primed by a smaller amount of electricity and the system brought to equilibrium (taking up to 3 weeks approx.).
If this is all correct (I may have made mistakes in the description above, and if so, I apologize... it IS a new science with little documentation to read about), then the matter states are stable, unlike a battery and its really the conformation of matter than creates a "push and pull" effect that ultimately flows the electricity along the now superconductive-like state wires.
The result is a device that can last a lifetime and would generate energy for a home with a device that is roughly 1 foot high, requiring no maintenance at all and no replacement parts, aside from very normal wear and tear based on where the device is, and whether it is properly sealed from the outside world etc....
I know, its pretty funky and hard to follow but I think I "get" most of the theory.
I have only 2 issues with this:
I can only validate half the science as the other half is a brand new science with no documentation available.
I won't be convinced that the whole thing is real until I see a unit working for myself. Then I can try to work with M. Keshe and others to figure out the details of the science so more people can do better applications of the tech.
IF IT CHECKS OUT: Advantages:
Free energy with no input required of other traditional forces.
Can be set up out of the way easily
Easy to build for less than $100 to feed energy to a whole house, no problem
Materials are super easy to come by
Environmentally friendly
Theoretically would gradually convert all that is wired with the device into a superconductive material, increasing the electrical efficiency of a whole system (helping neighbors and communities)
Disadvantages:
Information about how to build these is sketchy at best at this time. Blueprints are being defined though as we go.
Science is funky and only M. Keshe has a firm grasp of it. He is teaching others at this time though.
The technology and devices are untested in practice and are essentially "laboratory experiments" at best at this stage. Some shortfalls like bursting incandescent light bulbs have been reported. Experimentation is needed to figure how to use the tech in different situations, circumstances and how to scale them for larger capacities etc... Untested
This technology is currently UNVALIDATED by any unbiased 3rd party entity. A few like myself and the ZeroFossilFuel channel are attempting to do so from a skeptical point of view.
